The Apology
Jun. 11th, 2008 07:40 amI like how all of the news articles about The Apology seem to avoid any real discussion about the horrible stuff that went on in residential schools. (Yes, I'm using that special definition of "like".)
I wish there was more awareness of information like this, for example.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-06-11 02:03 pm (UTC)The Aboriginal vote tends to be solidly Liberal-NDP (maybe Green in some areas these days), and it will take substantially more than a blithe apology to change that. This is really more about convincing white people that aboriginal schools have been settled.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-06-11 02:07 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-06-11 02:42 pm (UTC)(Not from Australia ...)
(no subject)
Date: 2008-06-12 12:37 am (UTC)A first apology was made in 1998.
In 2005/2006, a (not especially good) reparations package was put forth. It includes some annoying conditions: if you take the money, you can't sue the Canadian government, and stuff like that.
I think Harper's apology is just a public relations matter. This is especially true given that the Kelowna Accord, one of the first major accords designed in tandem with First Nations and Inuit leaders, disappeared from the government agendas when Harper assumed power.
It's hard for me to see this as much more than Harper grand-standing. I want it to be more than that, but I can't convince myself that it is, I'm afraid.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-06-11 04:14 pm (UTC)Just saying.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-06-11 11:28 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-06-11 11:48 pm (UTC)The Christian faith is often very prominent in those reservations and areas with high native populations.
I'm not saying their not entitled or questioning their beliefs I'm merely juxtaposin' and philosophizin' on the matter.