Why, thank you! I almost rented it the other night (entirely because f Nick Cage). Now I think I won't (because as much as I like him when he does good work, I want to smack him when he's doing cheese.)
I was amused this morning when the CBC movie reviewer person on the radio rated it as the one "miss" in a grouping which included the new Fantastic Four movie (which he rated as thoroughly mediocre with bad acting, bad dialogue and no intelligence at all, but went on to say was a distinct improvement on the first Fantastic Four movie).
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
regna![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
(no subject)
Date: 2007-06-15 02:08 am (UTC)I've seen better films at B-Fest.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-06-15 05:46 am (UTC)Gasp!
Date: 2007-06-15 10:22 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-06-15 11:56 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-06-15 01:56 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-06-15 02:22 am (UTC)Nick Cage. It kinda follows.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-06-15 02:22 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-06-15 02:33 am (UTC)past that, eh. and there's a frightening bit where he's shirtless, and he really really does not look healthy.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-06-15 02:49 am (UTC)damn damn dam,n damn damn
Date: 2007-06-15 10:23 am (UTC)Not a flick for everyone though, like 300 (which is a flick for, um who I wonder?).
(no subject)
Date: 2007-06-15 12:58 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-06-17 01:18 am (UTC)