Stephen Harper's Doomsday Scenario

[bcholmes]

"Ohmigod, the Washington Times implied that our politics align with Bush's. Quick: refute it."

Via the_axel

EDIT: Ooops. Washington Times, not Washington Post.

Comments

[rbowspryte.livejournal.com]

My favorite part...."If Martin's Liberal Party is re-elected for the fourth consecutive time, Canadian taxpayers will continue footing the bill for an expensive welfare state epitomized by its archaic government-run health-care system. Social policy experimentation on issues such as drugs and homosexual rights will continue in an incremental but decidedly progressive direction."

I was unaware that we are an "expensive welfare state", and that our slightly flawed but "envy or the world" health care system is in fact a "archaic government-run health-care system".

(sarcasm)
I'm so glad that these unbiased oputsiders have told me this.

My vision of Canada is much more accurate now.
(/sarcasm)

I want to live somewhere where politicians believe in social darwinism and health care has a opportunistic or at the very least "take care of yourselves" attitude.

[curiousangel.livejournal.com]

Um, that's actually something in the Washington Times, which is the newspaper owned by the Moonies. It's not nearly as well-regarded as the Washington Post, which does a much better job of being a real newspaper.

Still, I'll concede your basic point. :)

[thespian.livejournal.com]

The Washington Times, actually, who are known to be a nutcase right wing paper, unlike the post.