Sigh

Nov. 2nd, 2004 09:55 pm
bcholmes: (Default)
[personal profile] bcholmes
So CNN has called Colorado's Amendment 36 defeated. Amendment 36 would split Colorado's 9 electoral votes as is done in Maine and Nebraska. Why the hell would someone be against this if they believed in, say, democracy?

(no subject)

Date: 2004-11-03 03:19 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] king-tirian.livejournal.com
First off, to be pedantic, it wouldn't split it as it's done in Maine and Nebraska. Even though those states have the opportunity to split their electoral representations in theory, it's never happened and are unlikely to do so tonight. Colorado, by contrast, would always be splitting their representation.

The pro-36 campaign is basically saying that no presidential candidate will ever give love to Colorado as long as they are felt to be a 55-45 lock for the Republicans. That's been true for the past few times, but I think it's just as suspicious to think that they're going to get mobbed over one vote at a time.

I'm apathetic on the issue. Actually, the Maine/Nebraska model seems very attractive to me, but only really if you got every state to simultaneously adopt it. Otherwise, the states that don't are such jackpots that candidates would still be spending all their time in Ohio, Michigan, and Florida.

(no subject)

Date: 2004-11-03 03:26 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] virago6282.livejournal.com
One thing I've heard as to why states don't do proportional electoral voting is because states with few electoral votes would get ignored all together. I'm from Indiana, so we're ignored anyways - but Iowa and New Hampshire would risk getting any attention.

I'm not sure if that's how I feel about it - just passing along the theory.

(no subject)

Date: 2004-11-03 05:13 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kalikanzara.livejournal.com
Could be that some people just like a republic.

(no subject)

Date: 2004-11-03 06:01 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] futabachan.livejournal.com
Colorado is in exactly the size range that gets the most benefit from the winner-take-all system.

(no subject)

Date: 2004-11-03 01:44 pm (UTC)
ext_28663: (Default)
From: [identity profile] bcholmes.livejournal.com
That sounds like a tremendously pedantic answer.

(no subject)

Date: 2004-11-03 04:55 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] msstacy13.livejournal.com
i still can't believe we have that here in nebraska, where it means, really, that the republicans gave the democrats a chance at one electoral vote...

i'm not complaining,
i'm just wondering what the democrats gave up for that...

Profile

bcholmes: (Default)
BC Holmes

February 2025

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
2324252627 28 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios