Thought for the Day

[bcholmes]

For months, British parliamentarians — including Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg — have been proposing changes to a 300-year-old law that would allow Prince William and Kate Middleton’s firstborn child to become monarch, regardless of its gender.

Britain’s Telegraph newspaper reports that Canada has expressed opposition to changing any legislation that would alter the principle of male primogeniture — the custom that makes the firstborn son of a prince or king heir to the throne, even if the child has an older sister. The report did not specify who in Ottawa opposed such a change.

When asked Monday about the government’s opposition to the change, Conservative Leader Stephen Harper said Canadians aren’t interested in a debate on the monarchy.

“The successor to the throne is a man. The next successor to the throne is a man,” Harper said during a campaign stop in Yellowknife, N.W.T. “I don’t think Canadians want to open a debate on the monarchy or constitutional matters at this time. That’s our position. I just don’t see that as a priority for Canadians right now at all.”

— "Is Canada stalling royal succession reforms?", The Toronto Star

Comments

[trouble]

That just strikes me as a weird thing to argue about.

[kalmn]

does the toronto star always have rhetorical questions for headlines?

[bcholmes]

I heard that they hired ELIZA to write their headlines.

[hypatia]

it makes more sense in the context of steven harper being a sexist douchebucket, though.

[trouble]

Well, yes, but it's just ... why waste even the tiniest amount of political capital on it? Does Harper even care who the monarch is? I'm surprised he hasn't pushed a referendum on ditching the monarchy yet.

[maize]

So wait, his argument is that we're going to block reform because maintaining the status quo most accurately reflects Canadians' position of not caring one way or another?

[bcholmes]

Apparently!