bcholmes: (politics)
[personal profile] bcholmes

What's different about the current Harper craziness and the Byng-King matter? Seriously, I thought that the fall-out of Byng-King was that the whole "let's go from non-confidence to coalition of the opposition" isn't politically okay?

I am full of the not understanding.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-11-30 06:04 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] james-nicoll.livejournal.com
One obvious difference is that Harper has not actually asked the GG to dissolve Parliament. I don't know if that makes it better or worse.



(no subject)

Date: 2008-11-30 09:53 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jeffreyab.livejournal.com
People are also bringing up the Peterson Rae deal of 1986 which unseated Miller and lead directly to a Liberal government with no election.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-11-30 10:05 pm (UTC)
the_axel: (Default)
From: [personal profile] the_axel
I read it as Byng-King has established a precedent for the current circumstances so it is okay to do that.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-11-30 11:50 pm (UTC)
ext_28663: (Default)
From: [identity profile] bcholmes.livejournal.com
But wasn't Rae-Peterson immediately following the election? The rules, as I understand them, are that whatever party (or group of parties) can control parliament after the election get to form the government. Miller had more seats but couldn't form the government without NDP support.

Harper is, theoretically, in the same place, but the time for asserting a coalition government would have been immediately after the election. Or at least that's how I understand the rules.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-12-01 06:18 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jeffreyab.livejournal.com
The 1985 election was May 2. 1985 and the government was defeated on June 18, 1985 so the timeline is not too far off.

There is no deadline to defeating a government.

Alexander Mackenzie defeated MacDonald in 1873 after he had been in office over a year and formed a government. He then called an election for Jan 1874 but things were different then and Mackenzie was bringing in electoral reform like the secret ballot and one day elections.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-12-02 02:22 pm (UTC)
ext_28663: (Default)
From: [identity profile] bcholmes.livejournal.com
Hm. It looks like you're right.

I stand corrected.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-12-02 02:32 pm (UTC)
ext_28663: (Default)
From: [identity profile] bcholmes.livejournal.com
No, I take it back. The Miller government was defeated at the conclusion of debate of the Throne Speech, which is first opportunity to prove confidence for a new government. Miller never attained confidence.

Profile

bcholmes: (Default)
BC Holmes

February 2025

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
2324252627 28 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios