bcholmes: (politics and strange bedfellows)
[personal profile] bcholmes

>>snort<< The only people I saw objecting to the term [strike] wouldn't know a collective bargaining agreement if one crawled into their sinuses and took a shit.

The love of my life

My heart goes fookin' pitter-pat.

I was commenting to Siobhan about how there's a lot of analysis of the business of television -- about what constitutes "content" and what constitutes "fill" and what the product of television is -- that seems to be mostly ignored in the conversation about yesterday's strike.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-03-22 11:49 pm (UTC)
erik: A Chibi-style cartoon of me! (Default)
From: [personal profile] erik
The product of television? That's easy if you observe the universal rule: follow the money.

Who pays TV's bills? Advertisers.
What are the advertisers buying, then? Views. Viewers. Interested eyeballs.
What is the product of television? You are.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-03-23 02:07 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ruth-lawrence.livejournal.com
The love of your life is gezackly correct.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-03-23 03:22 am (UTC)
ext_6381: (Default)
From: [identity profile] aquaeri.livejournal.com
It's interesting how they're able to sneak stuff past people by calling us "consumers".

(no subject)

Date: 2008-03-23 04:20 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] laura-seabrook.livejournal.com
I came across one poster on a friend's journal loudly touting the futility of that action by the fact that he (and/or friends) had organised extra posts on http://community.livejournal.com/statements - the postings for the 21st went from an average of 1700 to over 11,000 - and how that would effectively cancel the strike.

Think they missed the point entirely.

Profile

bcholmes: (Default)
BC Holmes

February 2025

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
2324252627 28 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios