No, Michael Howard strikes me as an even poorer choice than Mr. Blair.
I don't know enough about the Lib Dems to venture a guess as to Kennedy's chances, and from little I've read of the Greens, they apear to be even less organised than they are in the US.
Anyone but
Date: 2005-04-12 03:08 am (UTC)Re: Anyone but
Date: 2005-04-12 03:26 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-04-12 04:00 am (UTC)Or, failing that, the Liberal Democrats
Re: Hurm
Date: 2005-04-12 04:21 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-04-12 08:18 am (UTC)This seems a fairly realistic outcome.
Re: Anyone but
Date: 2005-04-12 08:55 am (UTC)I don't know enough about the Lib Dems to venture a guess as to Kennedy's chances, and from little I've read of the Greens, they apear to be even less organised than they are in the US.
Off hand, I'd probably go LibDem.
Vote for insanity, you know it makes sense!
Date: 2005-04-12 08:58 am (UTC)(although it does sound a lot like our current two party system...at least in name.)
(no subject)
Date: 2005-04-12 02:15 pm (UTC)http://www.whoshouldyouvotefor.com/
(no subject)
Date: 2005-04-13 09:27 pm (UTC)