Spider-man Shrugged
Aug. 2nd, 2004 10:19 amI somehow stumbled on some articles about Steve Ditko (the original artist for Spider-man, Dr. Strange, Shade, the Changing Man, and The Question.
I did not know, until now, that Ditko was an Objectivist (a philosophy that I consider to be pretty much morally bankrupt). Not just an Objectivist, but really Objectivist.
According to some sources, he quit Marvel because:
Stan Lee had wanted a villain called "The Green Goblin" to have an alter ego of a prominent businessman, and Ditko objected both to the heavy-handed ultimatum requiring this development and the notion that a career criminal might prosper in commerce among free men. He saw criminals as, essentially, bums who turned to criminal methods out of lack of the necessary grit to succeed at honorable callings. Lee persisted, Ditko quit Marvel Comics
I have never read (or even seen copies of) Ditko's Mr. A, which is apparently the most political of his work, but I was interested in the suggestion that Rorschach (of The Watchmen) was basically a fusion and satire of The Question and Mr. A. What's especially weird is that, I guess, Ditko really kinda believed the stuff that Rorschach believed (although the misogyny is probably an invention).
Here's an amusing quotation I found:
[An essay in The Comics Journal] relates the great story about how Kirby wanted the Him/Warlock story of Fantastic Four #66-67 to be a critique of objectivism, but Lee gutted it, which led to their falling out. Very interesting. "When I peel off the mask of the supervillain, all I see is the face of Ayn Rand, the philosopher-bitch who managed to outdo Yoko Ono and blast apart two of the 1960's most creative partnerships."
(no subject)
Date: 2004-08-02 08:09 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-08-02 08:13 am (UTC)The Watchmen was conceived as a treatment of the Charlton Comics characters, which DC had just acquired from that company's receivers for next to nothing. I don't remember all of them, but Rorschach=Question, Owl=Blue Beetle.
DC balked at killing off all this intellectual property they'd just paid for, even though they'd paid hardly anything. But they liked the concept, so Moore came up with a whole pantheon of new characters to kill off.
(I don't think the whole mess of Charlton characters have made them as much as Watchmen, so it's an interesting philosophical question whether DC did the right thing by pushing the change. Rorschach is a compelling character, and he would not have existed in that form as a reworked Question.)
(no subject)
Date: 2004-08-02 08:28 am (UTC)*nod* I was aware of that history (I've got a cool limited-edition Watchmen hardcover that reprints Moore's original proposal . At the same time, I didn't think that The Question was anywhere near as absolutist nor as violent as Rorschach.
Here's an interesting interview with Moore, who says:
(no subject)
Date: 2004-08-02 09:39 am (UTC)*boggle* How ever not?
(no subject)
Date: 2004-08-02 08:10 pm (UTC)I've heard of members of the species that are gainfully employed, including one scary fucker who was the section chief of a company I interviewed with back in '98. One of the mandated questions in the interview was "Have you ever read 'Atlas Shrugged'?". If the answer was "No", the interviewer donned a sheepish smile and gave the interviewee a free copy. They were like fucking Scientologists.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-08-03 01:19 am (UTC)